|
Sustianability's Search of Micro Up Collaboration Networking Clubs
Yes You and Peers can save the world if you know how to interactively connect 3 critical dimensions of collaborating
round human sustainability: community banking, worldwide summit networking, designing the world's most purposeful
organsiations (aka the entrepreneurial revolution of social business systems and partnering networks) around services children rank as most vital including health, learning,
clean water food, energy, safety WHY | This
page is about a quest for a solution that 18-25 year olds can learn-action-network everywhere that they spend a year or more
together - one core of this being undergraduate clubs. To understrand how to benchmark clubs on their quality of "micro
beyond macro" and "collaboration beyond competition" we need to agree what the crisis of losing human sustainability
revolves round. Future history (rightside) provides one lens of sufficient sytemic integrity (we welcome other ways of seeing
the crisis that the worldwide now senses Yes We Can Inauguration needs to celebrate as USA faces and books up to its greatest
human sustaining challenge ever - transformation from superpower to superempowerment. These are the most exciting times to
be alive. We have already passed the boundary wherein all peoples are more connecetd than geographically separated. This means
that if the USA is to achieve the sustainability goal all peoples eveywhere will have been involved in positively interacting
with thos people who happen to be the 5% of the planet on land geographically and legislatively known as USA. | By 1984, Europe's senior economist was publishing books
on how the tv age had turned most macroeconomics into disgraceful political chicanery. The wrong stuff that as one generation
raced to network local to global connectivity could spin the end of human sustainability at a rate that would accelerate
expoentially until we passed tipping points where no attempt at mid cousre cirrection would succeed. Please note this problem
was also being identified as the ultimate responsibility of what educational curricula we program minds around among any profession
that fixes measuremnts, laws, or how we mediate and communicate difference between false (ie system trust-flows destroying)
and true (ie system trust-flows sustaining), but somehow if economists are mistaken on every nightly news broadcast that is
the fastest itlellectual way to destroy human sustainability theory can think of. EXAMPLE OF WRONG STUFF Almost
all young people I meet, and even a majority of elders enjoy saying that humanity has ended slavery and apartheid. This isnt
actually true. About one sixth of children are born into local communities that involve slavert or apartheid by any rational
measures of these terms. Our seonior economist would argue that it is not the fault of tehse places but of history's empire
and other systems that has exponentially extracted (and so destructed) viability of being born into these places. Economics
compounds evil (whether intentional badwill of mafiosa leaders or blindwill of those who govern without mapping contextial
depth of transparency) when it separates value of collaboration from competition. Children are the greatest sustainability
invstment our species makes. And even the hardest mind in the world cannot deny that he would not have lived if he bad been
born into a place qith zero collaboration. Oddly the origins of adma smith free market economics defined what colaboration
needed to be systemised before competition had any chnace of developing value. For examle if the state of rampant competition
is such that people near the top of the bigegst organsiations race to mix toxicity into the information that the world had
assumed safety depended most on then you colapse banking systems. In 2008 we saw this happen. In effect this is the last call
to : study microeconomics as more basic than macroeconomics (please note the importance of mapping ever more mcro
in any field maths can inform was why we celebrate Einstein and Von Neumann as most important mathematicians ever) value
enough collaboration before we then overlay useful competition |
|